I’m not a constitutional lawyer, but I could argue the following:

If the domestic insurgency in Seattle has decided to name its conquest CHAZ and asks for the identification of those who enter and leave, it’s fair to call them secessionists. As a secessionist location surrounded by the United States, they must wait for their turn for an executive audience. Just like any other foreign entity. It appears that Washington State has no intention of defending its sovereignty and upholding its constitutional agreements. Therefore, I’d argue that CHAZ is a combative enemy of the United States! Furthermore, Washington State and the City of Seattle are negligent in their defense of the citizens of the United States of America by allowing and even encouraging a revolution to take place on its territory.

And in that case, it must be required that CHAZ create trade deals with local purveyors of food and commodities, and the State of Washington must now receive permission from the US government to aid a combative entity out of compassion.

https://nypost.com/2020/06/12/seattle-protesters-accused-of-hijacking-black-lives-matter/